.
Feedback

Upper Moreland Election Coverage: Ward 6 on the Issues

Ward 6 candidates Susan Worth-LaManna and Sam Valenza share their thoughts on major issues concerning residents of Upper Moreland.

Patch brings you the second of its three-part series on Ward Commissioner candidates’ thoughts on the following township issues and concerns:

 

  • Revitalization
  • Fiscal Responsibility
  • Storm Water Management

 

---

Speaking with Patch in separate interviews, Ward 6 candidates and provide their responses below:

 

On Revitalization

Susan Worth-LaManna

Worth-LaManna has a mantra when it comes to revitalization: “Clean, Green and Walkable.”

Worth-LaManna recalls the several revitalization plans over her 34-years she has lived in the township. Pointing to a summery of a past township revitalization plan, created earlier last decade, Worth-LaManna quotes a line to describe areas of the township that are not pedestrian-friendly, particularly those with SEPTA transit stops within the township.

“What has been done in nine-years to change that one line?” asked Worth-LaManna, adding that she could likely find more examples of unchanged, but identified, areas in need of revitalization.

She further asked if the answer would need more grant seeking or hiring more consultants.

“Or, does it just require the will of the board to fix what is known as a hostile pedestrian environment and an inhospitable transit situation?”

Particularly, within the downtown area of Willow Grove, Worth-LaManna points to the difficulty of crossing York Road from the Willow Grove Train Station, as that is currently an illegal crosswalk. 

She said that that the projects in the expected new revitalization plan of the township’s revitalization task force, must be acted upon by the board. She also said that the current decisions being made at the township level, in terms of revitalization, are in need of a change.

“I like things good, but whatever happened to better and best?” Worth-LaManna said. “Why do you think that change is going to be a negative?”

 

Sam Valenza

Valenza said that revitalization has to be done, and it has to be done as a group effort.

“Everyone wants to see it succeed, because there is a need to have something done in Willow Grove,” Valenza said.

Recalling past years of when the immediate area around the was the hub of a popular business and entertainment district of downtown Willow Grove, Valenza said that he would like to see the train station moved up the SEPTA tracks toward Hatboro.

He said that if the train station would be moved on the other side of the track, the west side where the entrance to Veterans Memorial Park is located, and moved further up, traffic along Davisville Road and its York Road intersection would be alleviated and more parking for commuters would be available.

Valenza, who has been involved with past revitalization task force efforts, said that developers are interested in developing downtown Willow Grove. And, while past revitalization efforts are township improvements, including the creation of the Veterans Memorial Park entranceway, Valenza said that expediting revitalization will come down to how the township works with developers interested in pursuing projects suggested by the .

“Once the first one gets started, and they have a positive experience, from the township staff to the board of commissioners, developers will want to develop in Willow Grove,” Valenza said, emphasizing that township commissioners must be in full-favor of redevelopment and encourage developers to pursue the project ideas.

“I’m not saying give them cart blanche,” Valenza said of the developers, and added that he would trust the township staff to guide board decisions on projects. “And, I got to tell you, I think we have a great township staff and a great professional staff.”

 

----

 

On Fiscal Responsibility

Sam Valenza

Valenza disagrees that it will be possible to downsize township positions and maintain the same level of service to the community.

He gives the example, should the township’s zoning department staff decrease; processing and community development time would increase. Valenza also points out there have already been staff reductions in recent years within township departments, including Public Works and Parks and Recreation, as the board of commissioners did not hire replacements for vacated positions.

As for union staff positions, particularly within the police department, Valenza explained that the township is tied to the decision of an arbiter, who compromises between the best interests of both township and union staff.

Valenza further explained that the township has operated in the red for the last five years. He attributes the lack of a tax increase for several consecutive years, due to the decision of a majority of the board, which, he explained, resulted in the 13.6-percent real estate tax increase last year.  

“I’ve always been in favor of a 2-to-4-percent tax increase a year - only if we’re operating in the red,” he said, adding that the township had to use fund balance transfers to balance the budget, due to lack of revenue. “You can operate in the red, but you’d have to put it on a credit card, and that’s not the way you do business.”

He added that, due to lack of township funds, his 2008 asset allocation table plan, which would have outlined a way to pay and maintain township assets, could not be completed.

Valenza further explained that the incremental tax increases would be more affordable to residents, while putting funds into the township’s capital reserves. As chair of the finance and administrative committee, Valenza said it is important to build up the capital reserve funds, as that is what maintains Upper Moreland’s AAA township bond rating.

 

Susan Worth-LaManna

Worth-LaManna’s focus on fiscal responsibility is on management of township employees and resources.  

“Learning to live within your means is a phrase that actually has an action behind it,” she said.

She addresses the municipal three-year contracts given to certain township employees in June of this year, identifying a 3-percent raise each year, adding that the previous three-year contracts gave an overall 14-percent raise. She also identifies that those township employees do not participate in contributory medical benefits.

“I don’t think it’s ok,” Worth-LaManna said, emphasizing the township employees’ minimal cost-share medical plans. “How about the rest of us who pay out of pocket for our kids? You pay, $14,000 for two kids to have braces on their teeth, and you get a little passionate about it.”

She said that township employees must be treated with respect, but also with an understanding of participation in relation to the means of the township. This is why Worth-LaManna suggests taking an audit of all township employees.

“Every good, strong municipal government can take a look at itself internally, and ask itself the big question, ‘Can we afford this?’” she said. “It’s what you do in a good family, it’s what you should do in your personal life.”

She said that an audit would be able to bring consensus to the board when opportunities, such as reducing staff, are presented.

Worth-LaManna specifically said it was a missed opportunity for cost-reduction when the board approved the creation of the police community service representatives, when their previous positions had been transferred to a countywide dispatch system.  

“We can always bring somebody back,” Worth-LaManna said. “But, let’s start with what we think we can finance, and look at exactly at what [positions] would do to augment every member of this township’s life.”

 

---

 

On Storm Water Management

Susan Worth-LaManna

If elected, Worth-LaManna said she would see to the creation of an “Office of Storm Water Management.“

“Storm water relates more, in my thinking, to infrastructure,” she said. “It needs to go somewhere.”

Worth-LaManna said she also has storm water and ground water issues on her own property. She would like to see a township that pays attention to water as a precious commodity, and see how the township could capitalize on it.

She said that she would like to look at future projects that further track storm water flow along its waterways, and see if the water ways themselves are in need of repair. She adds that infrastructure areas, identified as insufficient in handling flooding, would be directly addressed through the office.

She said that the office would help residents maintain waterways on their private properties and provide expert knowledge on water issues.

“There are multiple areas here for consideration,” she said.

 

Sam Valenza

“Storm water management has been a problem in this township for over 30 years,” Valenza said.

He said the first steps the township has taken toward better storm water management were to identify the township’s problem areas of flooding. He does say that most of the storm water issues stem from Horsham Township, and future increased communication will be needed to address those issues.

Valenza also said that he has supported many of the recent initiatives coming from the community development committee, such as giving developers the opportunity to opt into an in lieu of fees for their projects that would benefit storm water and parks and receration issues.

Valenza stated that he would also support, as soon as the economy recovers, a 1-percent tax increase toward storm water management.

“Because, it’s about time that someone steps up and starts taking responsibility toward storm water issues,” he said. “Let’s look at what we can start doing; it may not be much now, but we should get the ball rolling. “

Tom Winterberg November 3, 2011 at 07:08 pm
"If elected, Worth-LaManna said she would see to the creation of an “Office of Storm Water Management.“"
So, how does she expect to pay for it?? Let go of current staff to hire someone new? Sounds like she is just looking for talking points. Storm water management is not just an Upper Moreland issue! Our flood waters mainly come from the areas upstream. This issue is something that the Counties (Bucks and Montgomery) along with the State need to address!
Susan E. Worth LaManna November 3, 2011 at 10:40 pm
Tom--thank you for your response. Yes, this is a "talking point," and not one that I feel has been appropriately dealt with by the BOC. We have a storm-water "study", from 8/08, completed by our then Engineering firm. When you read it, you see that it is actually a compliation of flooding areas in the township. The relationship between streambanks in these areas and other information that would make it an actual "study" are absent. Our own Engineer calls the numbers associated with doing "fixes" in these areas "napkin numbers," meaning that they are rough. At this point, not one project has been brought forward. So, I would begin in the same manner as the Board established the EAC in October 2008..bring together interested citizens to express their concerns and ideas to build consensus toward a project. I would continue to educate myself in BMP's by serving on regional stormwater management groups, and I would work with the municipal staff in the acquisition of appropriate grant-funding. I would reach across township lines, as well, knowing that water flows downhill and cost-sharing is possible. I hope this answers your questions, and by-the-way, thank you for your service -- while we move forward in this area, we will still rely on emergency water rescue to insure the safety of our citizens. Best to you and your family, Susan
elizabeth Glover November 4, 2011 at 02:57 am
Dear Ms Worth LaManna:
Thank you for caring and for your well thought-out plan of actions for the problems in Upper Moreland. They are articulate and specific. It seems you have studied the problems and are able to focus on the future. Again, thank you for your time and dedication. It is refreshing to read replies that are intelligent without a hint of snarkiness. Good luck to you.
Tom Winterberg November 4, 2011 at 02:19 pm
Susan, Thank you for you reply, but you still didn't answer the question; How are we going to pay for a new "Office of Storm Water Management"?
Susan E. Worth LaManna November 4, 2011 at 04:24 pm
Tom--The quote "Office of Stormwater Management" was part of a longer statement on the need (as I see it) to provide centalization -- from the municipality -- of citizen concerns and complaints regarding stormwater, as well as education and ideas on what the homeowner could do, and what the township is doing or planning to do. Yes, this would be a new iniatiative, but not all new concepts require a new funding stream. I believe that we have a knowledgable municipal staff and a citizenry that can clarify needs to produce consensus-driven projects. IF it is the will of the Board, than the tasks of collecting and disseminating information around stormwater will be assigned internally. This is what I feel is called for in terms of a "work audit." I have always worked in a dynamic field, and, as ideas come (and others go), new tasks emerge -- not new personnel.I would also pursue grant-funding under the green initiatives that seek to fund environmental projects which aim to reduce our carbon footprint on the community. Have you seen the "green-roofed" SEPTA shelters? This is just one of several green ideas that bring stormwater management, cleaner air, and commuter comfort together in (what I consider to be) a great outcome. Thanks for the question! Regards, Susan
Tom Winterberg November 4, 2011 at 06:25 pm
Ok, your ideas are good ones but, with staffing where it is and finances where they are, what extra projects would you cut to allow the staff to focus on storm water management as you state above? In my opinion, our staff has enough on their hands with maintaining the services where they are.
At a recent meeting, citizens voiced their concerned that the streets were not getting milled and paved as much as they would like. The ideas you mentioned will require man-hours which I do not think the township can afford. You either need to find a new revenue source or cut existing projects to get this work done. Grants are nice but they require matching funds and we don't have extra funds that are not earmarked for other infrastructure projects.
Susan E. Worth LaManna November 4, 2011 at 07:46 pm
Tom--I don't know if the township can "afford" man-hours (may I also add, woman-hours) that are additional. The Budget review is Nov. 12th. However, I am talking about re-prioritizing and I acknowledge that this would take leadership. That is why I am running for the office of Commissioner: I have those leadership skills that inspire people to do more and better - not the same-old-thing with the same-old-outcome. When you added to your programs, were you blessed with more personnel and money, or did you need to look at your allocations and decide how to do things differently? In a down economy, leaders with ideas, energy, and vision do emerge. Don't you agree? As to the roads, I am on tape commentlng before the Board on just that issue. However, as you are very aware, the breakdown of our roads is intrinsically tied to stormwater/ground water issues and flooding. I believe that our current staff would be able to re-align themselves such that we could develop a Public Works/Stormwater Management program. If we don't start to change our thinking and action-steps, than we will just keep milling and re-paving, and what cost-saving is that to the taxpayers of UM? Grants are rarely a 50% match, so if we went into the funds for stormwater (See Comm. Dev. Committee Minutes) we would have a matching source. Good weekend to you all. I will see you at the polls, YES?

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Upper Moreland-Willow Grove Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something